Komparasi Protokol Komunikasi pada Sistem Produksi Siber-Fisik berbasis IEC 61499

Authors

  • Rico Aryandaru Departemen Teknik Nuklir dan Teknik Fisika Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Awang Noor Indra Wardana Departemen Teknik Nuklir dan Teknik Fisika Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Agus Arif Departemen Teknik Nuklir dan Teknik Fisika Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/jeeccis.v14i1.630

Keywords:

Cyber-Physical Production System, IEC 61499, communication protocol, latency, jitter

Abstract

The change in the concept of an automation pyramid into an automation cloud in a cyber-physical production system makes data communication no longer stratified but can be done directly between devices. Based on IEC 61499, which defines the function blocks for building such communications, communication protocols can be run on various devices. Several communication protocols that can fulfill these requirements are OPC-UA, FBDK / IP, and MQTT. The research was conducted by comparing the three communication protocols for latency parameters and their jitters. The test method used to compare latency parameters is the variance analysis test and the Tukey test. The jitter value of the protocols are compared to the standard deviation parameter. The test results showed that the MQTT communication protocol had a faster latency value, with a 95% confidence level. The standard deviation of the variation value for OPC-UA, FBDK / IP, and MQTT showed the jitter value of 0.72 seconds, 0.35 seconds, and 0.64 seconds. Comparing the three communication protocols' standard deviation values showed that the FBDK / IP communication protocol has significantly less jitter than the OPC-UA and MQTT communication protocols.

References

K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, London: Penguin, 2017.

J. Jasperneite dan M. Wollschlaeger, “The future of industrial communication,†IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, vol. 11, hal. 17-27, Mar. 2017.

A. Zoitl dan R. Lewis, Modelling Control Systems Using IEC 61499, London: Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2014

IEC 61499 compliance profile for feasibility demonstrations (2019), Holobloc [Daring]. Tersedia: http://holobloc.com/.

W. Mahnke dan L. Stefan-Helmut, OPC Unified Architecture, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.

Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, MQTT 3.1.1, OASIS, 2014.

A. Zoitl dan W. Monika, “Towards an industry 4.0 compliant control software architecture using IEC 61499 & OPC UA,†pada 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2017.

A. Zoitl dan S. Andreas, “Real-Time communication for IEC 61499 in switched Ethernet network,†pada International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems, 2010.

L. Valima, “MQTT client implementation in IEC 61131-3 compatible programming environment,†Tampere University of Technology, Finland, 2017.

T. Strasser, M. Rooker, G. Ebenhofer, A. Zoitl, C. Sunder, A. Valentini dan A. Martel, “Framework for distributed industrial automation and control,†pada IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 2008.

R. D. Aryandaru, “Analisis pengaruh protokol komunikasi OPC-UA, FBDK/IP dan MQTT terhadap nilai Latency dan Jitter pada sistem berbasis IEC 61499â€, Tugas Akhir, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2018.

Minitab Expert Support (2020), Minitab, [Daring]. Tersedia: https://support.minitab.com.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-24

How to Cite

[1]
R. Aryandaru, A. N. I. Wardana, and A. Arif, “Komparasi Protokol Komunikasi pada Sistem Produksi Siber-Fisik berbasis IEC 61499”, jeeccis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. pp. 35–40, Apr. 2020.

Issue

Section

Articles